To view this content, you must be a member of Tobias's Patreon at $1 or more
Already a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to access this content.
Author, Futurist, Wordsmith for Hire
This is too honest by far, and I wonder if it is perhaps unhelpful for me to talk openly about. Vulnerable is hard. But, I would have loved to have read this years ago, so let’s do this: I want to talk about how much I write, and my current experiment of writing 500 words a day and how it has gone for me.
If you’ve been following me over the years you’ll be aware of the fact that I enjoy running experiments and taking a look at data generated along the way.
Not all of the experiments work. In fact, I’d say most of them fail.
But that in and of itself is an item worth noting.
Often I show up with graphs.
I love graphs.
So here’s the background. One of the most frequently asked questions I get is “where do you get your ideas from?” We’re not going into that today. But the next most asked question is “what’s your daily writing schedule like?”
I have ADD. What’s my daily writing schedule? Often to me it seems like asking: what’s your daily bladder schedule? What’s your sneeze schedule like?
In some ways, it’s like allergies, right? I have no idea what the sneezes will come out like on an hourly basis, but I know that different seasons come on regularly. Deadlines are the seasons. I think.
What I often tell people is that I have lots of different phases of things that have worked for me at different times of my life.
The First Big Decade: My 20s
My career started at 19 with my first sale of a story. In my late teens, I used to aim for “1K per day,” or a thousand words a day, with weekends off and vacations off. But I didn’t actually log what I actually achieved back then, so I can’t say for sure what that added up to.
So let’s look at my 20s. I had ADD, I used caffeine to self medicate, I had a lot of energy. My routines were built out of my throwing any time I had around my dayjob at writing stuff. I would write on my meal breaks. I would write when I got home and on my days off. I would charge myself up with caffeine, focus, and then write until I dropped.
The words came in surges. Days of a thousand, two thousand, and three thousand words.
In college, I would often write until I fell asleep, head on the desk next to the keyboard.
Invariably those days were followed by collapse days. Days where I would flop around and recover. Sometimes they were for recharging. Sometimes I just couldn’t write anymore. Sometimes my hands just hurt.
I wrote a hundred stories in college this way. I wrote novels in my twenties this way. I started a career this way. It got me where I am. I don’t regret it. I was able to carry it off, so I did, and it worked.
Because I’ve always been interested in self tracking and data since my early twenties, I’ve kept at least information on how much I wrote during the day.
Now just because I keep daily writing logs doesn’t mean you have to, or even that it’s mentally healthy to do it. But here’s what logging does for me: it shows me days I’m not creating new stuff. And, when I don’t get to make new things, I feel down.
I like to daydream, to make things up, to make my puppets dance. The further away I get from noodling around, the more tense I get.
Why?
I have to imagine it has something to do with the fact that I have been making shit up on the page with intent to have it read since I was thirteen. And creative for as long as I can remember. So the less creative, the further I am away from that act, the less I feel like myself.
But, I’m ADD, and I have no executive function around time awareness. If I don’t log in, write down my word counts, and look at what I did the previous day, I have no awareness of time spent on a project. I can go weeks without doing something because once it’s out of my mind, I have zero ‘niggling’ in the back of my head that says ‘hey buddy, there was this thing…’ like it seems others do.
It’s why all my bills are automated. It’s why my phone beeps at me several times to remind me of upcoming important events, even though I keep a bullet journal as well.
That is also why I log things. Logging things make them real to me. More importantly, logging shows me when things aren’t happening.
So in my twenties I logged the words I wrote.
Here’s a look at what writing the first draft of my novel Crystal Rain looked like in my early twenties:

You can see how I worked. Clumps of days of work, followed by days of recovery. 1,200 words, 1,700, 800, 900, then days of rest. Sprint, exhaustion, sprint exhaustion sprint exhaustion.
The big rest in the middle was a break from the novel to work on two short stories commissioned from me. It took thirty days out of the novel, as once I finished the stories it took a couple weeks to get back to the novel.
But it worked, as I said. Even with a month off in a middle, 179 days to write a novel is snappy.
Of course, that leaves out revision. You can’t represent revision on a chart like that. Honestly, it doesn’t even represent the work that went into the first draft. Are 500 word days less than 1,800 words? Only if they’re all the right words. I can write the right 500 words that advances a novel, does something well, or I can push 1,800 words that later need heavily revised or even deleted. But here’s something that chart can certainly show me: days I don’t write and patterns.
Days off aren’t a problem in and of themselves. They’re time to recoup and refill the well. But it can reveal gaps, and using the logging always shows me when too much time has elapsed. Half the reason that chart looks like it is because I would see the gaps forming as I logged too many days not writing and know I needed to think about writing again.
Again, that can backfire. Many writers develop guilt and fear about getting to their writing because of seeing things like that. And creating feelings of shame, fear, and other negativity around writing is a perfect recipe for killing the creative worker.
But in my twenties it all worked well enough.
Interestingly, despite days of writing almost 3,500 words in epic writing jams, if you look at all those days off and if you run the average words written over the 179 days of the project it turns out that in my twenties, fueled by caffeine and late night writing jags when I had all the energy of a young, earnest, fired up writer I hit an average of… 450 words a day.
Hold that number for later.
The Second Decade of Writing Furiously:
My energy levels changed when I turned thirty. I collapsed from a heart defect I didn’t know I had, survived, and was asked by my cardiologist to not take any stimulants, which are what most ADD medicines use.
Getting back to writing again after months of piecing my life together, I found a few things out as I started a new decade of my life. The first? I used caffeine to self medicate my ADD. I hadn’t realized my habit for work always started with caffeine. The second? As a person with ADD, I’d really developed deep mindset buried in that cycle of a deadline oriented sprints under which I’d thrived. The third? I had newly born kids and everything had changed.
My thirties, then? Ten years of relearning how to live with ADD without caffeine. When the children were tiny, I worked at night because I took the kid night shift. That fit, even without caffeine, into my burn hard then collapse hard cycle. But it was exhausting.
One of the novels written during that time was Arctic Rising. Here’s the chart:

I still worked in similar patterns to my twenties, though I tried different times of day. The long break in the middle? A novella I wrote.
193 days for a first draft, and the daily average was 464 words a day.
When my kids started into school I tried a strict eight to five schedule. That worked for a while, but I found it constrictive and not easy to stay consistent on. But when I was consistent, the results were great. Here’s a short, short novel I did under a pseudonym written in that time:

A novel in three months. Nice. I averaged 639 words a day. Even nicer. This day-writing from nine to five looks good, right?
Well, I’m not showing you the weeks and months after the novels. Notice those little curves up during the last few days of the book projects? Those are high word days that would leave my wrists shot, my hands needing iced, and me needing to get out from under a “novel hangover” that lasted for days or a couple weeks.
As a night owl, even when I’m trying to ‘normalize’ my hours I often fall back into night habits, particularly when under deadlines, stressed, or trying to make sure freelance work gets done.
My entire life I’ve struggled to change that. At forty, I’m starting to suspect that maybe, just maybe, I’m never going to be up in the morning on the regular.
So what systems will work for me, with ADD, changing sleep patterns, deadlines, and the need to meet projects I’ve promised people?
I’ve been playing the game by lurching from one crisis to another, but in my mid thirties, without caffeine, getting tired from burn out when the sprint and rest cycles add up, and after going through a spot of career burn out a few years ago that I had to rehab from, I set out to write a novel without the constraints of a deadline to see what my natural rhythm was.
And here was the result:

The slope of when I am writing is steeper, but left to my own devices there are naturally bigger gaps.
Two really big gaps came courtesy of my attempt to heal my wrists. That first big leap of words left aching wrists, so I taught myself to type on a whole new keyboard and learned a new non-QWERTY style of layout called Colemak. That took out some days. The next big gap comes from a death in the family that I flew out of state to help with. That ate up my mindspace for a while.
This method led to 350 words a day average. But when I take out the weeks spent learning a new keyboarding system and the family death I get a figure of around about 450 words a day, depending on how I fiddle.
Interesting.
What I Know About How I Work So Far:
I’ve tracked information like this for all thirteen novels I’ve managed to write, as well as over a hundred short stories, some novellas, and more over the last nineteen years. Some of the books average higher than 500 a day. My best book was 1,600 a day average:

That book took a lot out of me, I was exhausted afterward. Words a day of fiction, where you are making stuff up whole cloth, is so much more challenging for me than freelancing. I could write far more reports, articles, and reviews than fiction. That 1,600 words of creativity really took it out of me.
But, the chart and project above, it did show me the power of no days off!
I am certainly not the most prolific author I know. But I am not the least. I’ve written 120 short stories, five novellas, and thirteen and a half novels in those nineteen years while juggling a day job for the first six years, and then a hybrid career of freelancing and writing.
That’s 1.5 million words of fiction that went on to become published and read by people.
That sounds impressive because it’s spread out over nineteen years. But it means on average that I have written roughly 85,000 first draft words a year since I graduated college, that then are polished, revised, and then end up in folk’s hands to read.
Since leaving my dayjob and publishing my first novel it’s been just shy of the 100,000 a year mark. I bounce between 100-125,000 words a year of material that then needs revised. Years where the finances pinch, I do more freelance work, and the numbers drop:

My best year was 2015. I wrote a lot. It came out to nearly an average of 450 words a day. In all my various sprints and rests. But when finances don’t require me to turn to staking more time toward freelance work, I write an average of 116,000 words of draft material a year that then goes on to be revised.
Again, I feel compelled to point out that creativity and productivity isn’t a machine. At various points along the way, I’ve looked at these numbers and thought about the gaps as places to push harder against. Usually that has led to me exhausting myself harder after a period of time. The mistake, particularly in a society dominated by quarterly profit extractive capitalism, is to try and wring more ‘productivity’ out of yourself like these words are widgets. They’re not.
But like using a journal to find out when chronic pain strikes the most, or what the frequency is, so you can plan your life around it, I look at my logs to try and learn about myself.
Looking at my logs I can see that leaving my dayjob increased how much I wrote by looking at the stats. The years I worked a dayjob I averaged 56,000 words a year of draft material that I then revised. Since becoming a freelancer and writer, I averaged 96,000 words a year. So I know moving away from the dayjob boosted the raw material I could create by 70%. Many folk who jump away from the dayjob expect vastly larger results, at least double, I often find. But a lot of creative work is still done outside of the actual hours of sitting at a keyboard putting down words. I think it turns out often we were doing them while at other work.
That being said, years without financial hardships lend themselves to 116,000 words a year of raw material, a 107% boost over when I was at a dayjob, implying a doubling of effort if freelance work wasn’t on the table and the creative work really paid out.
Also, many folk online say that hardship clarifies creative work and makes it better. But I know for a fact that a lean year means a 20% reduction in raw material to work with, crunched revision times, and a lot of personal stress and exhaustion. And the less I write, the less I earn, so it threatens to become a spiral for a creative as the one negative feeds the other.
But what does it mean about how I should write?
Well, I’m ADD, so for a long time I figured I had to resign myself to sprints and collapses. Particularly since that’s the pattern that resolved when I wrote a novel with no deadline, pressure, or constraints.
Other writers who daily marched and posted amazing wordcounts would march on past me as I wibbled around this way and that, then suddenly sprinted over there, and then circled back. This was who I was.
I could try medication, but most of the good ADD medications are a risk due to my heart (don’t email me/comment with medical advice unless you are actual licensed doctor, please do me the honor assume I self-advocate and talk to my cardiologist). I could write a much longer essay talking about everything I’ve learned about trying to write something as complex as a novel with ADD and my coping mechanisms, but that isn’t this essay.
But the other thing I decided to try was a small experiment in changing my sprint/exhaust/recovery cycle that has, now on my fourth month, really changed the entire narrative for me.
I listened to a friend and decided to try writing less.
Maybe Less Is More?
In a branch of the US military there’s a saying that “slow is smooth, and smooth is fast.” As I hit forty and started looking at twenty years of writing output, writing logs, my bibliography of what I’ve published, I started wondering how sustainable my working habits were.
A writer I know posted on social media something to the effect of “I always tell myself things will get better or slow down after I finish this mad project but they never do.” And for twenty years I spent a lot of time thanking the stars for my luck and oppurtunities, and dashing myself against the same sentiment. Work hard, burn the midnight oil, sprint now, and then I can relax after.
There’s never a later. Not if you suceed, oddly enough.
When I teach writing, I try to point out to writers that they should write what they love because if they don’t, if they get successful at writing what they don’t they’re stuck repeating the mechanisms that got them successful from then on, potentially putting themselves in a spot to be miserable from success. Counterintuitive? Yes. But I’ve seen it.
So why not apply that to methodology?
I’d done a lot of work getting my head back in the game after burn out. Learning why I wrote, what drove me, and getting back into loving words and making them.
But I also wondered about the next twenty years of sprinting.
What’s sustainable?
What would this look like if it were easy?
When I was nineteen and blistering away, sprint and exhaustion was fun and crazy.
Did I enjoy it now?
I wasn’t sure.
But it was hard to walk away from it when it had worked. It gave me my career.
So when a good friend mentioned they were trying a new approach to writing, focusing on 500 words a day and had gotten an amazing amount written with less drama, I started to consider trying it myself.
I worried that my ADD would get in the way. Writing every day in the past, like for that book where I hit 1,600 words a day, required iron will and at the end of the project exhausted me. Doing the same thing at the same size every day sounded repetitive, boring, and not aligned with my essential personality.
I worried that 500 a day wasn’t a lot. My usual goal when in full steam on a project was 1,000 a day. I’m a writer who works with New York, where a book a year is fine and in many literary circles that’s fast. Online, in self publishing forums I lurk in, people are talking writing a book a month. Some writers I see making the money I’d like to make are writing way faster than 500/day on average. It doesn’t seem like much, does it?
I also worried that this would fundamentally change the writing itself. Powering through on words that I didn’t want to write, when I could wait and write while under the impact of a huge writing sprint that might be better words would be better, right?
But we don’t learn by just doing the same thing forever without trying something new.
And what were the benefits? Well, the writers I talked to who use this method say they feel less overwhelmed, able to plan for deadlines, and that, actually, they were writing more raw material than I was. 180-200,000 words a year of raw material. Or, if they were not able to edit in the same track, 120-130,000 words.
That intrigued me, because it was no drama method of hitting my own speed.
And there was a small possibility of doing more without breaking myself.
Color me intrigued.
Yet, I resisted it for months. I’d been getting things done. Change is hard, and so on.
But then I got stuck on a short story I owed someone. And the deadline whizzed past. And the feelings of dread and fear came back. I struggled and struggled with an empty screen, when I knew that if I just pushed hard enough I could have a draft done in a couple days. The story’s topic depressed me, but it was for a theme on that topic so I couldn’t just change the heart of the story. I half asked to get out of writing the story, but the editor offered me an extension. I felt doubly guilty and horrified.
Then I broke. Just two years after fixing myself from burnout, a couple of stories I owed broke me.
And that felt awful.
With nothing to lose, I decided to try 100 days of writing 500 words a day.
Trying 500 Words a Day
Right away, it broke the logjam. Because I wasn’t trying to write as much as I possibly could in a day. In a way, that sets you up for failure, because it’s a hard to define. My mind was previously telling me that “you’re BEHIND. Your mortgage depends on this. You need to get this done! What do you need to get done? ALL OF IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT!”
It’s hard to start shoveling a mountain.
But when I started 500 words a day, all I had to do was shovel roughly 500 words. And I did.
And then stopped.
I had the rest of the day ahead of me. I could go catch up on other work. Take a walk. Read a book. No more guilt, panic at falling behind. Because I’d done the 500 words.
The weight of relief is hard to describe.
And the next day, I logged on, and wrote 500. Then stopped.
If I kept going, in ten days or there about, I’d have the raw material of a story.
Something magical happened, too. With the rest of the day to mull over the 500 words I’d written, the intractable issues of the story became tractable. I saw ways in. I could let the story sit in the back of my head and roll around a bit.
In fact, I often knew what was coming next because I was stopping at 500, which meant I often still had momentum that carried over into the next day as I knew the very next thing I was about to write when I stopped the afternoon before.
After nine days, I had a story done. No drama.
Hell, I had gone from wondering how in the hell I could write it to laughing as I wrote it and having fun.
I took a day off to rest, relieved.
And then a day became two, then three, then four.
I panicked. I had a Patreon story I owed my supporters. There was no room in my budget to miss one. I worked all day and a late night and got a story done and wrote 1,800 words.
That exhausted me. I loved the story, but it took it out of me. I took a couple days off. And that became a week because, well, I had so much work to do it seemed impossible to tackle and…
500 a day. I restarted the new attempted habit after falling off the horse.
I got 42 days in a row the next time instead of nine. And it became clear to me that this was the way to go. I got all the short stories done. I got my Patreon story done. I started my new novel. All without panic. And falling into the rhythm became easier and easier as each day passed.
A few things became clear to me. One, for the first time, I could create a simple Gantt-like chart of when I would have a draft (roughly) of a project. At 500 words a day, I know story Z will be eight days of work. For the first time in my life, I know roughly when the novel draft will be done, and I know when the stories will be done, and I know what the impact of saying ‘yes’ to a story commission (or an idea that springs into my head) will be.
I can’t really convey the feeling of control and confidence that gives me after twenty years of just, throwing myself at the deadline to see if, yet again, I could make it.
So, it helps me get started. It helps me estimate deadlines. It reduces the stress.
This is all good.
But I noticed a few more things. I started getting smaller projects done and things for me done. That book I wanted to read, well, I hit my 500. So lets read it. I’ve fallen so far behind on just pleasure reading because I would hear this ‘YOU SHOULD BE WRITING!’ voice. But knowing I’d done the daily amount, I could move on from that internal guilt.
I could also spend more time on my 500 words. Editing them on a line level was easier if I wanted to fiddle and play with them. So that was a bonus.
I also found that the 500 words a day worked really well with my ADD scattered mind. If I was having a really tough day with ADD brain, I could write 50 words here, 100 there, and take a whole damn day to get 500 words. I could be interrupted by children without feeling resentful, or emergency email without panicking. Instead of forcing myself to go dark against my nature, I could flit around and dribble out the words. But when laser focus hit, I could just be done quickly. I could chop it up, or do it all in one go. Whatever changing weirdness my brain was up for that day.
One thing that made earlier approaches hard was that I change my schedule, float from early to late nights. Work at weird times. With this 500 words a day, I could be a good citizen and get it done early in the day like a normal human. Or I could stay up late to work on it.
Another unexpected bonus was that I had more time to consider the story. It’s one thing to have an outline, another to have this thing in your head, and then, when rubber hits road, there’s what you see when what you put down is suddenly exposed to the light of day. Several times, after writing 500, I’ve had the rest of the day to think about what I wrote, and realize that the story really could benefit from a different take ahead than I had thought. Characters had more time to live and breathe. I’m quite delighted with some of the things I came up with because I was slowing things down.
Slow is smooth, and smooth is fast.
I had to take a loss when I got hit with a massive kidney stone that needed surgery. 12 days off in recovery, on opiods, lying about, only in the mood to watch TV. That was 6,000 words lost.
I bumped my internal expected deadline back for the novel, and restarted 500 words a day. I’m 30 days into it, and after I finish this essay, I’ll do my 500 words of fiction.
Here’s what 104 days of this experiment look like:

Even with 12 days lost to surgery and some other off days, I am averaging 503 words a day. I occasionally hit ~1,000 words, those are on days where the writing is coming easily, and I just let it keep going. I note those as ‘engaged days.’ Flow days. Days where the writing is easy, good, and comes from the ether. The other days, they’re the days when this is work, and it doesn’t come easy. Days when I look up at the mountain and think ‘it’s okay, you just have to shovel 500 words and then you can go do something else.’
I don’t know where this will lead. It may be that my true talent lies in surge writing and then resting. I’m not telling you this is the ONE PATH. I am noting that, after 104 days of doing this, if this continues, I’ll have my best year next year without a lot of the fear that has accreted around deadlines and repeatability.
The trick is finding something that works, something that is healthy and sustainable. Is sustainable knowing you’ll get a draft in November with NaNoWriMo and revising as you can all year? If that works year after year and you find it sustainable and nourishing, go for it. If 250 words a day is the amount you feel is discrete enough you can, certainly, always get it, then do that. If a 1,000, sure. When I went back in to have a second surgery to remove an internal stent I set a goal of 100 words a day as a ‘sick goal’ because I felt daily practice was good for the ADD mind. I blew past to 500 each time, even though I felt like crap.
Seems sustainable.
But I feel silly. It still doesn’t feel like much. And if this is the way I need to write to make it sustainable, it feels ridiculous that I’ve found what works for me at forty.
The best time to plant a tree was years ago. Next best time is now.
I guess I’m curious to see what people think of the work I’ve been doing. That’ll let me know that the 500 words a day isn’t making me a crappier writer! But mostly, I’m really enjoying 500 words a day on the daily level. It’s removed a ton of stress around the nature of making this my daily job.
So when people ask, how do you work?
This is currently it. It wasn’t always this.
I don’t know if it will last, but there you go. I hope I can keep doing this. If I find success with this, I can see doing it a long time.
I don’t want to say that Hans Christian Anderson didn’t tell the whole story. Hans was a noble collector of tales handed down from generation to generation all throughout the countryside. But one has to understand some of the complications with the narrative as it’s been picked up and remembered.
There are many claims to the truth of this story, and, as a scribe, it is my duty to head out and collect them. After spending several weeks canvassing the countryside, I submit this report to you in earnest.
We begin with the initial core story that you may well be familiar with, and it is this:
Many years ago, there was an emperor so vain and fond of new clothes that he spent all his money being well dressed. One day two swindlers came to town and let it be known that they could weave the greatest fabric in all the world. In fact, it was so fine that only those people who were stupid or unworthy of their positions could not see it.
The emperor, dazzled by the idea of dressing in the finest thread in all the world, allowed the swindlers, who pretended to weave the cloth but were really holding empty air, to trick him into making him a fine new outfit.
Then he paraded himself through town, as his courtiers and officers held empty air, pretending it was the train of his gown.
It was a child that pointed at the emperor—a child cloaked in the innocence of their age—who cried out, “that man has no clothes on!”
That’s roughly what everyone remembers, and to tell the story again, it seems like the spell is broken. The high, unworldly clarion call of the child pierces the entire sham and shatters it. The emperor is shamed, and tries to carry on down the street, but knows the truth of it all.
But that’s not how the real world works, is it?
***
Gary (some names have been changed to protect sources) is a distant relative of the child who spoke up in the courtyard.
“I wish she’d kept her little mouth shut, that poor idiot child and her family,” he tells me.
We break our fast just outside one of the smaller villages in the periphery of the emperor’s domain. As far as I can tell, Gary seems to shovel shit for a living, and his boots are stained with it. He wears a simple tunic, a floppy head covering, and has a simple, hard-working face.
Gary eats a single loaf of wheat bread and drinks watered beer.
“No good comes of yelling out at royalty what they ain’t or what they is wearing,” Gary continues.
Certainly, Gary notes, there are far worse things the rulers of the empire have done than walk through a town buck naked. Gary ticks off a list of crimes against serfs, inquisitions, expeditionary wars abroad, colonization on other continents, and rapes never brought to justice.
“A lap in your own skin?” Gary shakes his head and finishes his beer. “Hardly anything for us to get worked up about. If that kid had been raised with a lick of common sense, those weavers would have been paid in a few weeks and moved on, and we’d all of us had a good story to tell. Instead…”
He trails off.
Instead.
Gary sighs. “I knew it was a bad business when he stopped at the Victory Arch and whispered to the head of his guards.”
Moments later men armed with crossbows beat back the crowds and dragged the little girl off in chains for sedition and inciting the crowds to riot.
***
After an evening spent trying cheeses down in the eastern boroughs, I found myself in the company of a member of the privy council smartly dressed in purple hose and a shimmering silk tunic. We ate sliced aged cheese and figs drizzled in honey.
We talk about the gazette that I write my reports for, long respected in four different countries in the region. My subject apologizes for not reading it several times before turning to the reason he has hunted me down to sup with me.
“I don’t want to talk about the clothes, we have to focus on the child,” the representative of the emperor tells me in between a tasting tray of southern red wines.
“The child?”
“Yes.” He waves his glass of wine in the air. “Who was paying her to slander the emperor? Was she under the influence of anti-patriotic concerns?”
The emperor’s court was under siege from the enemy, and that meant everyone in the country needed to come together and get past their divisions.
“But she was just a little child, surely— ”
“Her parents took out a loan from merchants in another country. Another country, can you imagine? And her uncle travels across the border every month. Make sure you write that down. It’s all very suspicious.”
“How exactly?”
But he narrows his eyes. “It’s suspicious. They could be taking money to cause unrest here inside our country.”
“Are they?”
“They could be.”
I write down that the emperor’s representatives think that the girl could be influenced by elements seeking to cause unrest from outside the country.
***
There’s something I have to do next that I don’t want to do. But taking down a full account of what has happened requires it.
Chains rustle gently in the wind, and the cage swings slowly, thunking against the stone walls of the castle as I approach. The little girl inside shivers as the wind kicks up.
She eyes me warily, huddling deeper into a wet wool blanket that someone has given her. I give her a bundle of wax paper with bread and cheese inside, which she greedily scarfs down.
I’ve been told her parents are jailed as well. Her blanket, as well as food and water, have been snuck in at night by relatives who have to walk all the way in from a nearby town.
After some coaxing, the child warms up to me.
“He was stark naked,” she says. The defiance in her tone wobbles a bit. She’s been living in a cage for two weeks. But she does not withdraw the explosive allegation that the emperor was walking, nude, through the middle of town.
“All my life, I been taught to tell nothing but the truth by my parents, my teachers, and my priests. When I saw him walking over the cobblestones, he was nakeder than someone talking a bath. All I did was say it out loud, because I’ll tell you this, everyone was muttering it to themselves.”
“That’s true, but, you know that this cloth is a special cloth,” I countered. “Only certain types of people can see it. It’s only those unusually stupid, or unfit for their office, that cannot see it.”
So many people forget that part of the story.
The child stopped gnawing on a piece of bread and eyed me critically. “I don’t have a station,” she observed. “Are you calling me stupid?”
“I make no such claims,” I said, drawing myself up. “I am only a chronicler of events for the gazette. I write down—”
“Did you go see him?” the child asked. “Go see the emperor and write down what you see instead of talking to me.”
***
After calling on many of the fine houses of the empire and being turned away, I finally am able to talk to a noble who knows how to grant me an audience with one of the weavers in question. This is the closest I can get to seeing the emperor for now, until the next time he goes on a parade.
The weaver wears elegant, imported silk, and insists on showing me the complex machinery that is involved in making the emperor’s new clothes.
“I want to show you this,” he says. “It’s a Garibaldi Loom. Two hundred carefully oiled parts, the most complex, advanced piece of machinery in the entire continent. You can’t deny it, right? You see the machine in front of you, correct? It was imported. Make sure you write down that we have a Garibaldi Loom.”
The weaver stares at me until I write it down, carefully, in my notebook.
“This is a special cloth,” the weaver says. “Only those fit for their office can see it. Do you understand what that means?”
The weaver holds his hands up in the air as if he’s holding something.
“If you truly are worthy of your position,” he says, his eyes glinting in the shadows of the workshop, “then you could see the beauty and craftsmanship of what I’m showing you.”
“I—” want to tell him I can’t see anything.
“Or, and I can’t imagine this applies to you, but, if you’re stupid, you may not be able to see the cloth.”
I am forced to defend my intelligence, explaining my academic pedigree.
“Of course you couldn’t be stupid. Here,” the weaver says, and approaches me. “It’s a scarf. Let me put it on you.”
He acts as if he’s doing me the world’s greatest favor as I’m made to feel like I’m in the circle of an exclusive club as the weaver drapes the scarf around me and nods approvingly. “Keep it. It is a gift to you.”
At the door on the way out, I think the wind nips at my neck a bit, but I’m suddenly not sure.
***
“I mean, from the emperor’s position, you have to imagine it,” says Maximillan Weber, a noble in the court. “Stop getting hung up on whether anyone was naked or not. Imagine you’re given a tool that allows you to determine whether or not people in your administration are worthy of their position or stupid. Wouldn’t you use such a tool?”
Maximallan Weber, as far as I can tell, is not wearing anything at all. Which would normally be quite… alarming.
But to say anything out loud would be to suggest that I was stupid. That’s the political atmosphere in the empire, now. So, whether I think I am stupid or not, I cannot verbalize what I think.
Instead, I do my level best to lock eyes with Maximillan Weber’s eyes and not look down as I take my notes for my story.
“Well?” he asks.
I cannot offer an opinion on a hypothetical, but stammer, “Some would say that it has not been proved that the threads can really do this thing.”
“Have those people proved that the threads _can’t_ do such a thing?”
“It’s impossible to prove a negative—”
“That’s what *they* want you to think,” Maximillan Weber shouts, standing up, much to my distress.
“Who?”
“The enemies of the state. Those dirty people. Foreign influences!” Maximillan gesticulates. “But the emperor didn’t ascend to his position by being an idiot. He’s playing a more advanced game than any of us. Always one step ahead. You mark my words, this disruption will reveal to him who his enemies are and the true state of things inside the borders. This will be a good thing. A great moment in our country’s history.”
I am escorted out of the mansion by Maximillan Weber’s wife. The Lady Weber is draped in a voluminous evening gown.
She notices my look.
“I told my lord that I am far too simple a woman to dare wear threads that would reveal to the world that I married above my station,” she says to me, with a cryptic smile.
***
My last interview about the matter is with the town crier, who stood on a raised platform on the day in question and saw everything. She fills me in on the times of day and the sequence of alleged events.
“Alleged?” She frowns at that word.
“Well,” I explain, “I wasn’t here, so who can say what happened?”
She shakes her head over the beer I have purchased for her. “Until the day I die, I will tell you he was naked. He was nude. He wasn’t wearing any clothes. I saw his genitals.”
Everyone in the tavern stared at us.
“I didn’t,” the town crier says emphatically, “want to see his genitals. Emperor or not, uninvited genitals are the worst.”
“Some would say that the clothes could only be seen by those fit for their stations, or who were not stupid.”
The crier laughs. “Why are you quoting them? They aren’t here, it’s just me and you. You’re dragging them in here to create a conflict when right now, anyone in this establishment knows what they say, right?”
There’s a hearty cheer of assent.
“Listen,” the crier says, leaning closer to me. “You write this down, and you write down what they say. But if it rained last night, and I tell you it didn’t, and Jeffrey over there says it did, one of us is right, yeah? You should be figuring out who got soaked, not just taking care to put both arguments down on paper.”
I am forced to say that she has a point.
“Besides, how do you justify putting children in cages over it all? Talk all you want about differences of opinion, but right now there’s a child hanging in a cage outside a castle wall. If that ain’t a failure of decency I don’t know what is. All this talk about stations and stupidity just obscures a simple fact: that he exposed himself to a lot of people who didn’t want it. Doesn’t matter what the threads are or how they work or don’t.”
And on that, the crier stood up and walked back to the bar, ending our interview.
***
So, what then to make of the emperor’s new clothes?
Well, I am just a scribe. I write it all down, but you are the one who has to decide.
But I do know this: there are strong opinions on either side of the issue of the emperor’s new clothes.
Over the years I’ve seen some writers who took the full time plunge express strong imposter syndrome and a sense of shame when going back to a day job. Sometimes it kills their desire to write because they feel like a failure.
I don’t think biographies of writers emphasize how many famous writers had day jobs.
TS Eliot worked in a bank his whole life, even turning down an offer to be given a fund to write full time. William Carlos Williams was a doctor until a stroke stopped him in his old age. Many writers transition into professors thanks to their body of work. Kafka was an insurance exec.
When I grew up, I knew people who wanted to sail the Caribbean and live a different life. They would work until they had enough money, then head off to sail.
Creatives are similar. I know writers who write fiction full time. I know writers who freelance and write fiction. Teach and write fiction. Have a spouse with a generous income and write. I know writers who work hard at a job for a part of the year, but have chosen a profession where they can take time off. Some arrange for a month of furious creativity, some can stretch it to six. Some work a random set of weeks, then unknown weeks off, depending on career. Some work a job and save furiously for two or three years, then quit and see how long the ride can last.
Some writers had a day job while working on their break out, and then life after became different. Yes. And yes, full time writing is a great dream.
But not at the expense of your health, or family’s health.
There are three levers to pull. Make more money, get more flex time, reduce expenses.
It’s hard to make more money at your art, you can’t wave a wand. But a day job is usually more money than writing, so that’s a lever. One can put the extra money aside and build toward a defined amount of time off. Like mini retirements. Google ‘mini retirements.’
Flex time can be hunted for, by looking for a job that has flex time. They’re harder to find, but there are seasonal jobs, there are jobs with flex time. One can sit and think hard about exactly what is the perfect job for the creative you want to be. One can look for jobs that have downtime built right into them.
Everyone suggests reduce expenses, and I know we all have if we’re creatives, but there are options if you don’t have a family to move to other parts of the world where the exchange rate goes further. It was a world I grew up in and a valid way to make being a writer more feasible.
The reason so many American writers went to Europe after WW2 was because the economies were devastated and rent was cheap. And even then, Hemingway had to plan where to walk lest he pass by bakeries and be tortured by the smell of food. I live in a small, affordable town in rural America, which is how I use geographic income arbitrage to my favor.
The achievable goal is to build a sustainable creative practice with the tools you have on hand and go after it with everything you can. But not to feel shame about what happens next. Even the writers we were taught to adore struggled to get by. The idea that a full time career is THE win scenario is not helpful because it’s an externally applied judgement.
Look, one of my favorite all time writers is Ted Chiang. I’m not the only one who thinks that. Every time he writes a story, and he writes one or two a year, they win all the awards. Right here in this Boing Boing interview Ted, in 2010, mentions that he’s a freelance technical writer who works for part of the year, then takes another part off (yes, after a movie has been made of his work that is likely not true, but, that’s what he did for decades).
I humbly submit that if one’s definition of creative success doesn’t have a bracket for Ted Chiang, it might need reconsideration.
There are many ways to do this, and those ways will shift and change throughout a career.
Here’s a thing I keep noticing, and it drives me nuts.
In Italy, a ship captain is arrested for bringing immigrants to shore after rescuing from them near death at sea:
The number of migrants reaching Italy’s shores has drastically diminished – just 2,800 so far this year – and the country is now led by a right-wing populist coalition elected partly on an anti-migrant platform.
Yet, at the same *exact time* a town in Italy is offering money to people to move there.
…one town in the country is offering foreigners $10,000 to move there. Another says it will even pay newcomers more than $1,000 per child to make babies.The deals may seem too good to be true for many who dream of escaping the rat race for the idyll of a rustic Italian village. For the destinations involved, they represent a last-ditch battle to save the souls of their dying communities.